A Subjective and Objective Integrated Method for MAGDM Problems with Multiple Types of Exact Preference Formats
نویسندگان
چکیده
Group decision making with preference information on alternatives has become a very active research field over the last decade. Especially, the investigation on the group decision making problems based on different preference formats has attracted great interests from researchers recently and some approaches have been developed for dealing with these problems. However, the existing approaches can only be suitable for handling the subjective preference information. In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems, in which the attribute values (objective information) are given as non-negative real numbers, the information about attribute weights is to be determined, and the decision makers have their subjective preferences on alternatives. The provided subjective preference information can be represented in three well-known exact preference formats: 1) utility values; 2) fuzzy preference relations; and 3) multiplicative preference relations. We first set up three constrained optimization models integrating the given objective information and each of three preference formats respectively, and then based on these three models, we establish an integrated constrained optimization model to derive the attribute weights. The obtained attribute weights contain both the subjective preference information given by all the decision makers and the objective information. Thus, a straightforward and practical method is provided for MAGDM with multiple types of exact preference formats.
منابع مشابه
A Subjective and Objective Integrated Approach to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Preference Information on Alternatives
This paper investigates the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems with preference information on alternatives. An integrated approach is proposed to solve the MADM problems, where decision makers' subjective preference information on alternatives are given in different formats, uniformed and aggregated. The resulting social subjective preference information on the alternatives is i...
متن کاملInformation-Theoretic-Entropy Based Weight Aggregation Method in Multiple-Attribute Group Decision-Making
Weight aggregation is the key process to solve a multiple-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problem. This paper is trying to propose a possible approach to objectivize subjective information and to aggregate information from attribute values themselves and decision-makers’ judgment. An MAGDM problem without information about decision-makers’ and attributes’ weight is considered. In order ...
متن کاملExact Mixed Integer Programming for Integrated Scheduling and Process Planning in Flexible Environment
This paper presented a mixed integer programming for integrated scheduling and process planning. The presented process plan included some orders with precedence relations similar to Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem (MTSP), which was categorized as an NP-hard problem. These types of problems are also called advanced planning because of simultaneously determining the appropriate sequence and m...
متن کاملTriangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Triple Bonferroni Harmonic Mean Operators and Application to Multi-attribute Group Decision Making
As an special intuitionistic fuzzy set defined on the real number set, triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number (TIFN) is a fundamental tool for quantifying an ill-known quantity. In order to model the decision maker's overall preference with mandatory requirements, it is necessary to develop some Bonferroni harmonic mean operators for TIFNs which can be used to effectively intergrate the informa...
متن کاملDesigning a model of intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR in multi-attribute group decision-making problems
Multiple attributes group decision making (MAGDM) is regarded as the process of determining the best feasible solution by a group of experts or decision makers according to the attributes that represent different effects. In assessing the performance of each alternative with respect to each attribute and the relative importance of the selected attributes, quantitative/qualitative evaluations ar...
متن کامل